2024 was a pivotal year for cryptocurrency, driven by substantial institutional adoption. The approval and launch of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs marked a turning point, solidifying digital assets as institutional-grade. Bitcoin has evolved into a macro asset, and the ecosystem’s outlook remains robust, with signs of regulatory clarity in the US and increasing broad adoption. High-quality research from firms like VanEck, Messari, Pantera, Galaxy, and a16Z, has further strengthened my conviction.
As a “normie in web3,” my perspective comes from connecting the dots through research, not from early airdrops or token swaps. While the speculative frenzy, rug pulls, and scams at the “casino” end are off-putting, the real potential on the “computer” side of blockchains is thrilling. Events like TOKEN2049 in Dubai and Singapore highlight the ecosystem’s energy, with hundreds of side events now central to the experience.
As the web3 ecosystem evolves, new blockchains, roll-ups, and protocols vie for attention. With 60 million unique wallets in the on-chain economy, adoption is set to expand beyond this base. DeFi transaction volumes have surpassed USD 200B/month, yet the ecosystem remains in its early stages, with only 10 million users.
Despite current fragmentation, the future looks promising. Themes like tokenising real-world assets, decentralised public infrastructure, stablecoins for instant payments, and the convergence of AI and blockchain could reshape finance, identity, infrastructure, and computing. Web3 holds transformative potential, even if not in marketing terms like “unstable” coins or “unreal world assets.”
The Decentralisation Paradox of Web3
Decentralisation may have been a core tenet of web3 at the onset but is also seen as a constraint to scaling or improving user experience in certain instances. I always saw decentralisation as a progressive spectrum and not a binary. It is, however, a difficult north star to maintain, as scaling becomes an actual human coordination challenge.
In Blockchains. We have seen this phenomenon manifest with the Ethereum ecosystem in particular. Of the fifty-plus roll-ups listed on L2 Beat, only Arbitrum and OP Mainnet have progressed beyond Stage 0, with many still not posting fraud proofs to L1. Some high-performance L1s and L2s have deprioritised decentralisation in favour of scaling and UX. Whether this trade-off leads to greater vulnerability or stronger product-market fit remains to be seen – most users care more about performance than underlying technology. In 2025, we’ll likely witness the quiet demise of as many blockchains as new ones emerge.
In Finance. On the institutional side, some aspects of high-value transactions in traditional finance or TradFi, such as custody, need trusted intermediaries to minimise counterparty risk. For web3 to scale beyond the 60-million-odd wallets that participate in the on-chain economy today, we need protocols that marry blockchains’ efficiency, composability, and programmability with the trusted identity and verifiability of the regulated financial systems. While “CeDeFi” or Centralised Decentralised Finance might sound ironical to most in the crypto native world, I expect much more convergence with institutions launching tokenisation projects on public blockchains, including Ethereum and Solana. I like underway pilots, such as one by Chainlink with SWIFT, facilitating off-chain cash settlements for tokenised funds. Some of these projects will find strong traction and scale coupled with regulatory blessings in certain progressive jurisdictions in 2025.
In Infrastructure. While decentralised compute clusters for post-training and inference from the likes of io.net can lower the cost of computing for start-ups, scaling decentralised AI LLMs to make them competitive against LLMs from centralised entities like OpenAI is a nearly impossible order. New metas such as decentralised science or DeSci are exciting because they open the possibility of fast-tracking fundamental research and drug discovery.
Looking Back at 2024: What I Found Exciting
ETFs. BlackRock’s IBIT ETF became the fastest to reach USD 3 billion in AUM within 30 days and scaled to USD 40 billion in 200 days. The institutional landscape now goes beyond traditional ETFs, with major financial institutions expanding digital asset capabilities across custody, market access, and retail integration. These include institutional-grade custody from Standard Chartered and Nomura, market access from Goldman Sachs, and retail integration from fintechs such as Revolut.
Stablecoins. Stablecoin usage beyond trading has continued to grow at a healthy clip, emerging as a real killer use case in payments. Transaction volumes rose from USD 10T to USD 20T in a year, and yes, that is a trillion with a “t”! The current market capitalisation of stablecoins is approximately USD 201.5 billion, slated to triple in 2025, with Tether’s USDT at over 67% market share. We might see new fiat-backed stablecoins being launched this year, such as Ethena’s yield-bearing stablecoin, but I don’t expect USDT’s dominance to change.
RWAs. Even though stablecoins represent 97% of real-world assets on-chain and the dollar value of all other types of assets is still insignificant, the potential market for asset tokenisation is still a staggering USD 1.4T, and with regulatory clarity, even if RWAs on-chain were to quadruple, the resulting USD 50B will be a sliver of the overall opportunity. We can expect more projects in asset classes such as private credit – rwa.xyz is a great dashboard to watch this space.
DePIN. Decentralised public infrastructure across wireless, energy, compute, sensors, identity, and logistics reached a USD 50B market cap and USD 500M in ARR. Key developments include the emergence of AI as a major driver of DePIN adoption, the maturation of supply-side growth playbooks, and the shift in focus toward demand-side monetisation. More than 13 million devices globally contribute to DePINs daily, demonstrating successful supply-side scaling. Notable projects include:
- Helium Mobile: Adding 100k+ subscribers and diversifying revenue streams.
- AI Integration: Bittensor leading decentralised AI with successful subnets.
- Energy DePINs: Glow and Daylight addressing challenges in distributed energy systems.
- Identity Verification: World (formerly Worldcoin) achieving 20 million verified identities.
These trends indicate significant advancements in the web3 ecosystem, and the continued evolution of blockchain technologies and their applications in finance, infrastructure, and beyond holds immense promise for 2025 and beyond.
In my next Ecosystm Insights, I’ll present the trends in 2025 that I am excited about. Watch this space!
The fundamentals of Web 3.0 are deeply rooted in technology that is ever-changing and continuously evolving. Web 3.0, powered by blockchains and crypto, is the Internet’s biggest technological upgrade since it became mainstream in the 1980s.
What is Web 3.0 and Why Does it Matter?
Web 1.0 (1990-early 2000s) – READ. The early Internet was characterised by an open-source protocol like HTTP, where the value accrued to the users and builders. In this era, technology companies such as Google, Yahoo and Amazon made their mark by layering on services such as search, directory listings and media publishing over an open-source infrastructure, essentially creating an online version of the offline world. The core contributors to digital media were mainly journalists, writers and reporters who reproduced pieces of their print content in a digital format. There was very little censorship during this period and the information was available mainly as databases.
Web 2.0 (early 2000-today) – READ & WRITE. This phase witnessed a wave of tech advancement, upgrades to servers, faster Internet speeds, development of complex APIs, algorithms and code to create peer-to-peer opportunities, user-generated content and social networking. Services such as Facebook and Twitter began monetisation of the increased user base through digital advertising. The years 2007-2012 saw a mobile revolution with Apple providing users with their first iPhone in 2007 and opened doors to third-party apps and builders. Facebook’s mobile pivot in 2012 amplified user social connectivity tremendously.
The tech architecture for Web 2.0 is built on a client-server protocol, where users are the clients, contributing content and the companies control the servers. The core functionality of the early Internet which was open for anyone to use and build on, has now transformed where the authority rests in the hands of the few. The rise of the creator economy is dependent on the frameworks developed by centralised companies. Software and hardware upgrades and renunciation of data and privacy rights by users to platforms have further accelerated centralisation of power. The Web 2.0 ecosystem now has a monopolistic culture where the companies decide who can participate, in what capacity, and how much value to share with stakeholders. Consumers do not have any ownership of their data or control over how it gets used; while creators give up rights to their content and do not have the ability to export their fanbase out from the platforms they have used, to interact with their communities. There is no incentive alignment between corporations and networks, and the users have no say in the platforms’ economics and governance. Web 2.0 is an Internet era built on ‘rented land’ where users don’t own anything.
Web 3.0 (2020 onwards) – READ, WRITE and OWN. Web 3.0 is a new computing platform, a paradigm shift towards a more democratised Internet, which is owned by the users and builders who create and transfer value in a trustless and decentralised way, facilitated through tokens. It is re-engineering the Internet’s open protocol and leveraging its architecture to benefit people rather than corporations.
The Core Components of Web 3.0
In order to understand the importance of Web 3.0 as technological innovation, it is essential to learn about its core components – tokens and blockchains.
Tokens are pieces of code that are used to transact over a blockchain and provide a record of digital ownership. They can be fungible and non-fungible. Fungible tokens are interchangeable (fiat currency, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin). Non-Fungible tokens are unique, i.e no two tokens are alike (such as pieces of art).
The genesis of the blockchain architecture was developed by a pseudonymous individual named Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009, who developed a peer-to-peer electronic cash system called Bitcoin (the blockchain), that uses its native token (BTC) to transact over its network. Blockchain is a decentralised distributed ledger system, where transactions are executed and recorded in a series of immutable blocks on an interconnected network of nodes (computers).
Blockchains can be imagined as supercomputers that process thousands of transactions in exchange for incentives or tokens that accrue to miners and validators as rewards. Tokens are a new digital asset class that is increasingly seen as a store of value (Bitcoin), means of exchange (Ethereum, Solana and alternative cryptocurrencies), social currency (Rally.io) and several other use cases that offer utility and monetisation abilities to creators, entertainers and artists.
Future Value Drivers
Since 2020, we have seen the growth of cryptocurrencies and blockchain adoption by institutions and retail investors due to the decoupling of crypto into various value drivers like Decentralised Finance (DeFi), Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs).
DeFi. DeFi refers to a financial system that runs on blockchain technology, and uses smart contracts that replace the need for traditional financial (TradFi) businesses to act as intermediaries. Core functions such as lending, borrowing. and transacting takes place seamlessly without the need for banks to execute the transactions. DeFi runs on code, a set of rules that are predefined on smart contracts. Users of the decentralised protocol own the network and participate in the rewards through token distribution. Tokens are distributed as incentives to users who are contributors to the network. There are strong differences between DeFi and TradiFi on trust, transparency, identity and access.
NFTs. NFTs are a record of ownership of digital assets on a blockchain. Technological advancements to the Bitcoin Blockchain genesis architecture and the introduction of smart contracts to blockchains such as Ethereum enabled a new use case of tradeable programmable tokens to emerge in the crypto landscape.
NFTs have been transformational to digital asset ownership and saw exponential growth in user adoption in 2020. A key milestone event in the history of NFTs is the USD 69 million sale of ‘Everydays: the first 5000 days’, by digital artist Beeple at an art auction organised by Christie’s in March 2020. Transaction volumes have now surpassed nearly USD 13 billion.
NFT represents anything digital that’s unique (non-fungible), has value, can be traded and its ownership secured on a blockchain. NFTs most commonly represent digital art, but they can be digital wearables, in-game virtual objects, a contract deed attached to a property, a domain name, or even a piece of writing such as this insight! For the first time, it is possible to exchange value between two trustless individuals anywhere in the world without them needing to disclose their identities or establish any contact and have asset ownership transferred and recorded on a blockchain.
DAO. A DAO is a community that is created and managed by its members who band together to achieve a common objective. Web 3.0 has enabled a dynamic shift in behavioural economics which is drawing people to it. The shift can be described as triabism at times but has been fascinating. The ongoing pandemic made more people spend time online and in the Metaverse, connect with others and also create. That happy place is called a DAO, where humans meet to share, connect, and drive value in a digital world known as the Metaverse.
Here are some ways that a DAO differs from a corporate. Companies are governed by a hierarchical system whereas DAOs are run like cooperatives in a flat structure. Company management takes decisions whereas DAO members vote on proposals to take collective decisions. Companies hire talent that meets certain criteria whereas anyone can join a DAO if they hold the DAO tokens/NFT or get invited to join the community. Companies compensate their employees with salaries whereas DAOs reward contributors with tokens.
The Future of a Decentralised Economy
Web 3.0 is transforming the economics of the creative, media and entertainment industry by changing the dynamics of how value gets created and distributed. It is an Internet that works for stakeholders who own it and create value for themselves. The shift from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 is taking place more rapidly than the previous evolution of the Internet. The power dynamics and value generation are fundamentally changing how we view the Internet.
Web 3.0 is inevitable!
