Tag: ROI Models

Over the past year of moderating AI roundtables, I’ve had a front-row seat to how the conversation has evolved. Early discussions often centred on identifying promising use cases and grappling with the foundational work, particularly around data readiness. More recently, attention has shifted to emerging capabilities like Agentic AI and what they mean for enterprise workflows. The pace of change has been rapid, but one theme has remained consistent throughout: ROI.

What’s changed is the depth and nuance of that conversation. As AI moves from pilot projects to core business functions, the question is no longer just if it delivers value, but how to measure it in a way that captures its true impact. Traditional ROI frameworks, focused on immediate, measurable returns, are proving inadequate when applied to AI initiatives that reshape processes, unlock new capabilities, and require long-term investment.

To navigate this complexity, organisations need a more grounded, forward-looking approach that considers not only direct gains but also enablement, scalability, and strategic relevance. Getting this right is key to both validating today’s investments and setting the stage for meaningful, sustained transformation.

Here is a summary of the key thoughts around AI ROI from multiple conversations across the Asia Pacific region.

1. Redefining ROI Beyond Short-Term Wins

A common mistake when adopting AI is using traditional ROI models that expect quick, obvious wins like cutting costs or boosting revenue right away. But AI works differently. Its real value often shows up slowly, through better decision-making, greater agility, and preparing the organisation to compete long-term.

AI projects need big upfront investments in things like improving data quality, upgrading infrastructure, and managing change. These costs are clear from the start, while the bigger benefits, like smarter predictions, faster processes, and a stronger competitive edge, usually take years to really pay off and aren’t easy to measure the usual way.

Ecosystm research finds that 60% of organisations in Asia Pacific expect to see AI ROI over two to five years, not immediately.

The most successful AI adopters get this and have started changing how they measure ROI. They look beyond just money and track things like explainability (which builds trust and helps with regulations), compliance improvements, how AI helps employees work better, and how it sparks new products or business models. These less obvious benefits are actually key to building strong, AI-ready organisations that can keep innovating and growing over time.

2. Linking AI to High-Impact KPIs: Problem First, Not Tech First

Successful AI initiatives always start with a clearly defined business problem or opportunity; not the technology itself. When a precise pain point is identified upfront, AI shifts from a vague concept to a powerful solution.

An industrial firm in Asia Pacific reduced production lead time by 40% by applying AI to optimise inspection and scheduling. This result was concrete, measurable, and directly tied to business goals.

This problem-first approach ensures every AI use case links to high-impact KPIs – whether reducing downtime, improving product quality, or boosting customer satisfaction. While this short-to-medium-term focus on results might seem at odds with the long-term ROI perspective, the two are complementary. Early wins secure executive buy-in and funding, giving AI initiatives the runway needed to mature and scale for sustained strategic impact.

Together, these perspectives build a foundation for scalable AI value that balances immediate relevance with future resilience.

3. Tracking ROI Across the Lifecycle

A costly misconception is treating pilot projects as the final success marker. While pilots validate concepts, true ROI only begins once AI is integrated into operations, scaled organisation-wide, and sustained over time.

Ecosystm research reveals that only about 32% of organisations rigorously track AI outcomes with defined success metrics; most rely on ad-hoc or incomplete measures.

To capture real value, ROI must be measured across the full AI lifecycle. This includes infrastructure upgrades needed for scaling, ongoing model maintenance (retraining and tuning), strict data governance to ensure quality and compliance, and operational support to monitor and optimise deployed AI systems.

A lifecycle perspective acknowledges the real value – and hidden costs – emerge beyond pilots, ensuring organisations understand the total cost of ownership and sustained benefits.

4. Strengthening the Foundations: Talent, Data, and Strategy

AI success hinges on strong foundations, not just models. Many projects fail due to gaps in skills, data quality, or strategic focus – directly blocking positive ROI and wasting resources.

Top organisations invest early in three pillars:

• Data Infrastructure. Reliable, scalable data pipelines and quality controls are vital. Poor data leads to delays, errors, higher costs, and compliance risks, hurting ROI.
• Skilled Talent. Cross-functional teams combining technical and domain expertise speed deployment, improve quality, reduce errors, and drive ongoing innovation – boosting ROI.
• Strategic Roadmap. Clear alignment with business goals ensures resources focus on high-impact projects, secures executive support, fosters collaboration, and enables measurable outcomes through KPIs.

Strengthening these fundamentals turns AI investments into consistent growth and competitive advantage.

5. Navigating Tool Complexity: Toward Integrated AI Lifecycle Management

One of the biggest challenges in measuring AI ROI is tool fragmentation. The AI lifecycle spans multiple stages – data preparation, model development, deployment, monitoring, and impact tracking – and organisations often rely on different tools for each. MLOps platforms track model performance, BI tools measure KPIs, and governance tools ensure compliance, but these systems rarely connect seamlessly.

This disconnect creates blind spots. Metrics sit in silos, handoffs across teams become inefficient, and linking model performance to business outcomes over time becomes manual and error prone. As AI becomes more embedded in core operations, the need for integration is becoming clear.

To close this gap, organisations are adopting unified AI lifecycle management platforms. These solutions provide a centralised view of model health, usage, and business impact, enriched with governance and collaboration features. By aligning technical and business metrics, they enable faster iteration, responsible scaling, and clearer ROI across the lifecycle.

Final Thoughts: The Cost of Inaction

Measuring AI ROI isn’t just about proving cost savings; it’s a shift in how organisations think about value. AI delivers long-term gains through better decision-making, improved compliance, more empowered employees, and the capacity to innovate continuously.

Yet too often, the cost of doing nothing is overlooked. Failing to invest in AI leads to slower adaptation, inefficient processes, and lost competitive ground. Traditional ROI models, built for short-term, linear investments, don’t account for the strategic upside of early adoption or the risks of falling behind.

That’s why leading organisations are reframing the ROI conversation. They’re looking beyond isolated productivity metrics to focus on lasting outcomes: scalable governance, adaptable talent, and future-ready business models. In a fast-evolving environment, inaction carries its own cost – one that may not appear in today’s spreadsheet but will shape tomorrow’s performance.

We’re entering a new cycle of PC device growth, driven by the end-of-life of Windows 10 and natural enterprise upgrade cycles, brought into alignment by the COVID-era device boom. In Asia Pacific, PC shipments are expected to grow by 4-8% in 2025. The wide range reflects uncertainty linked to the US tariff regime, which could impact device pricing and availability in the region as manufacturers adjust to shifting demand globally.

To AI or Not to AI?

“AI PCs” (or Copilot PCs) are set to become a growing segment, but real AI benefits from these devices are still some way off. Microsoft’s announcement to embed Agentic AI capabilities into the OS marks the first step toward moving AI processing from the cloud to the desktop. However, for most organisations, these capabilities remain 12-24 months away.

This creates a strategic question: should organisations invest now in NPU-enabled devices that may not deliver immediate returns? Given typical refresh cycles of 3-5 years, it’s worth considering whether local AI processing could become relevant during that time. The safer bet is to invest in Copilot or AI PCs now, as the AI market is evolving rapidly; and the chances of NPUs becoming useful sooner rather than later are high.

Is the Desktop Being Left Behind?

PC market growth is concentrated in the laptop segment, drawing most manufacturers and chip providers to focus their innovation there. AI and Copilot PCs have yet to meaningfully enter the desktop space, where manufacturers remain largely focused on gaming.

This creates a gap for enterprises and SMEs. AI capabilities available on laptops may not be mirrored on desktops. Recent conversations with infrastructure and End-User Computing (EUC) managers suggest a shift in Asia Pacific toward laptops or cloud/ virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) devices, including thin clients and desktops. If this trend continues, organisations will need to re-evaluate employee experience and ensure applications are designed to match the capabilities of each device type and user persona.

Fundamental EUC Drivers are Changing

As EUC and infrastructure teams revisit their strategies, several foundational drivers are undergoing significant change:

• Remote work is no longer a default. Once considered the norm for information workers, remote work is now being reconsidered. With some organisations mandating full-time office returns, device strategies must adapt to a more hybrid and unpredictable working model.
• Employee Experience is losing budget priority. During the pandemic, keeping employees productive and engaged was critical. But with rising cost pressures, growing automation through GenAI and Agentic AI, and changing labour dynamics, EX is no longer a top enterprise priority and budgets reflect that shift.
• Cloud-based EUC solutions are now enterprise-ready. Since 2022, cloud adoption in EUC has accelerated. Solutions like Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS WorkSpaces, and VMware Horizon Cloud now offer mature capabilities. Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) is increasingly cloud-managed, enabling more scalable and agile IT operations.
• Zero-trust is moving security closer to the user. EUC security is evolving from perimeter-based models to identity-centric, continuous verification approaches. Investments in EDR, AI-driven threat analytics, MFA, biometric authentication, and proactive threat hunting are now standard, driven by the shift to zero trust.
• Device diversity is increasing. Standardised device fleets are giving way to more diverse options – touchscreen laptops, foldables, and a broader mix of PC brands. Enterprise offerings are expanding beyond traditional tiers to meet varied needs across user personas.
• Metrics are shifting from technical to outcome-based. Traditional KPIs like uptime and cost are giving way to metrics tied to business value – employee productivity, experience, collaboration, cyber resilience, and adaptability. EUC success is now measured in terms of outcomes, not just infrastructure performance.

Build a Modern and Future-Ready EUC Strategy

Organisations must reassess their plans to align with changing business needs, user expectations, and operational realities. Modern EUC strategies must account for a broad set of considerations.  

Key factors to consider:

Strategic Business Alignment

• Business Outcomes. EUC strategies must align with core business goals such as boosting productivity, enhancing employee experience, improving customer outcomes, and driving competitive advantage. Consider how device choices enable new work models, such as remote/hybrid setups, gig workforce enablement, and cross-border collaboration.
• Digital Transformation Fit. Ensure EUC refresh cycles are integrated with broader digital transformation efforts – cloud migration, AI adoption, automation, and innovation. Devices should be future-ready, capable of supporting the AI and automation needs of 2026 and beyond. While some workloads may shift to the cloud, others like GenAI-powered video and image creation, may demand stronger local processing across the broader workforce, not just specialist teams.

Technology Considerations