Trust in the Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI) industry is critical – and this amplifies the value of stolen data and fuels the motivation of malicious actors. Ransomware attacks continue to escalate, underscoring the need for fortified backup, encryption, and intrusion prevention systems. Similarly, phishing schemes have become increasingly sophisticated, placing a burden on BFSI cyber teams to educate employees, inform customers, deploy multifactor authentication, and implement fraud detection systems. While BFSI organisations work to fortify their defences, intruders continually find new avenues for profit – cyber protection is a high-stakes game of technological cat and mouse!
Some of these challenges inherent to the industry include the rise of cryptojacking – the unauthorised use of a BFSI company’s extensive computational resources for cryptocurrency mining.
Building Trust Amidst Expanding Threat Landscape
BFSI organisations face increasing complexity in their IT landscapes. Amidst initiatives like robo-advisory, point-of-sale lending, and personalised engagements – often facilitated by cloud-based fintech providers – they encounter new intricacies. As guest access extends to bank branches and IoT devices proliferate in public settings, vulnerabilities can emerge unexpectedly. Threats may arise from diverse origins, including misconfigured ATMs, unattended security cameras, or even asset trackers. Ensuring security and maintaining customer trust requires BFSI organisations to deploy automated and intelligent security systems to respond to emerging new threats.
Ecosystm research finds that nearly 70% of BFSI organisations have the intention of adopting AI and automation for security operations, over the next two years. But the reality is that adoption is still fairly nascent. Their top cyber focus areas remain data security, risk and compliance management, and application security.
Addressing Alert Fatigue and Control Challenges
According to Ecosystm research, 50% of BFSI organisations use more than 50 security tools to secure their infrastructure – and these are only the known tools. Cyber leaders are not only challenged with finding, assessing, and deploying the right tools, they are also challenged with managing them. Management challenges include a lack of centralised control across assets and applications and handling a high volume of security events and false positives.
Software updates and patches within the IT environment are crucial for security operations to identify and address potential vulnerabilities. Management of the IT environment should be paired with greater automation – event correlation, patching, and access management can all be improved through reduced manual processes.
Security operations teams must contend with the thousands of alerts that they receive each day. As a result, security analysts suffer from alert fatigue and struggle to recognise critical issues and novel threats. There is an urgency to deploy solutions that can help to reduce noise. For many organisations, an AI-augmented security team could de-prioritise 90% of alerts and focus on genuine risks.
Taken a step further, tools like AIOps can not only prioritise alerts but also respond to them. Directing issues to the appropriate people, recommending actions that can be taken by operators directly in a collaboration tool, and rules-based workflows performed automatically are already possible. Additionally, by evaluating past failures and successes, AIOps can learn over time which events are likely to become critical and how to respond to them. This brings us closer to the dream of NoOps, where security operations are completely automated.
Threat Intelligence and Visibility for a Proactive Cyber Approach
New forms of ransomware, phishing schemes, and unidentified vulnerabilities in cloud are emerging to exploit the growing attack surface of financial services organisations. Security operations teams in the BFSI sector spend most of their resources dealing with incoming alerts, leaving them with little time to proactively investigate new threats. It is evident that organisations require a partner that has the scale to maintain a data lake of threats identified by a broad range of customers even within the same industry. For greater predictive capabilities, threat intelligence should be based on research carried out on the dark web to improve situational awareness. These insights can help security operations teams to prepare for future attacks. Regular reporting to keep CIOs and CISOs informed of the changing threat landscape can also ease the mind of executives.
To ensure services can be delivered securely, BFSI organisations require additional visibility of traffic on their networks. The ability to not only inspect traffic as it passes through the firewall but to see activity within the network is critical in these increasingly complex environments. Network traffic anomaly detection uses machine learning to recognise typical traffic patterns and generates alerts for abnormal activity, such as privilege escalation or container escape. The growing acceptance of BYOD has also made device visibility more complex. By employing AI and adopting a zero-trust approach, devices can be profiled and granted appropriate access automatically. Network operators gain visibility of unknown devices and can easily enforce policies on a segmented network.
Intelligent Cyber Strategies
Here is what BFSI CISOs should prioritise to build a cyber resilient organisation.
Automation. The volume of incoming threats has grown beyond the capability of human operators to investigate manually. Increase the level of automation in your SOC to minimise the routine burden on the security operations team and allow them to focus on high-risk threats.
Cyberattack simulation exercises. Many security teams are too busy dealing with day-to-day operations to perform simulation exercises. However, they are a vital component of response planning. Organisation-wide exercises – that include security, IT operations, and communications teams – should be conducted regularly.
An AIOps topology map. Identify where you have reliable data sources that could be analysed by AIOps. Then select a domain by assessing the present level of observability and automation, IT skills gap, frequency of threats, and business criticality. As you add additional domains and the system learns, the value you realise from AIOps will grow.
A trusted intelligence partner. Extend your security operations team by working with a partner that can provide threat intelligence unattainable to most individual organisations. Threat intelligence providers can pool insights gathered from a diversity of client engagements and dedicated researchers. By leveraging the experience of a partner, BFSI organisations can better plan for how they will respond to inevitable breaches.
Conclusion
An effective cybersecurity strategy demands a comprehensive approach that incorporates technology, education, and policies while nurturing a culture of security awareness throughout the organisation. CISOs face the daunting task of safeguarding their organisations against relentless cyber intrusion attempts by cybercriminals, who often leverage cutting-edge automated intrusion technologies.
To maintain an advantage over these threats, cybersecurity teams must have access to continuous threat intelligence; automation will be essential in addressing the shortage of security expertise and managing the overwhelming volume and frequency of security events. Collaborating with a specialised partner possessing both scale and experience is often the answer for organisations that want to augment their cybersecurity teams with intelligent, automated agents capable of swiftly
As we return to the office, there is a growing reliance on devices to tell us how safe and secure the environment is for our return. And in specific application areas, such as Healthcare and Manufacturing, IoT data is critical for decision-making. In some sectors such as Health and Wellness, IoT devices collect personally identifiable information (PII). IoT technology is so critical to our current infrastructures that the physical wellbeing of both individuals and organisations can be at risk.
Trust & Data
IoT are also vulnerable to breaches if not properly secured. And with a significant increase in cybersecurity events over the last year, the reliance on data from IoT is driving the need for better data integrity. Security features such as data integrity and device authentication can be accomplished through the use of digital certificates and these features need to be designed as part of the device prior to manufacturing. Because if you cannot trust either the IoT devices and their data, there is no point in collecting, running analytics, and executing decisions based on the information collected.
We discuss the role of embedding digital certificates into the IoT device at manufacture to enable better security and ongoing management of the device.
Securing IoT Data from the Edge
So much of what is happening on networks in terms of real-time data collection happens at the Edge. But because of the vast array of IoT devices connecting at the Edge, there has not been a way of baking trust into the manufacture of the devices. With a push to get the devices to market, many manufacturers historically have bypassed efforts on security. Devices have been added on the network at different times from different sources.
There is a need to verify the IoT devices and secure them, making sure to have an audit trail on what you are connecting to and communicating with.
So from a product design perspective, this leads us to several questions:
- How do we ensure the integrity of data from devices if we cannot authenticate them?
- How do we ensure that the operational systems being automated are controlled as intended?
- How do we authenticate the device on the network making the data request?
Using a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) approach maintains assurance, integrity and confidentiality of data streams. PKI has become an important way to secure IoT device applications, and this needs to be built into the design of the device. Device authentication is also an important component, in addition to securing data streams. With good design and a PKI management that is up to the task you should be able to proceed with confidence in the data created at the Edge.
Johnson Controls/DigiCert have designed a new way of managing PKI certification for IoT devices through their partnership and integration of the DigiCert ONE™ PKI management platform and the Johnson Controls OpenBlue IoT device platform. Based on an advanced, container-based design, DigiCert ONE allows organisations to implement robust PKI deployment and management in any environment, roll out new services and manage users and devices across your organisation at any scale no matter the stage of their lifecycle. This creates an operational synergy within the Operational Technology (OT) and IoT spaces to ensure that hardware, software and communication remains trusted throughout the lifecycle.
Rationale on the Role of Certification in IoT Management
Digital certificates ensure the integrity of data and device communications through encryption and authentication, ensuring that transmitted data are genuine and have not been altered or tampered with. With government regulations worldwide mandating secure transit (and storage) of PII data, PKI can help ensure compliance with the regulations by securing the communication channel between the device and the gateway.
Connected IoT devices interact with each other through machine to machine (M2M) communication. Each of these billions of interactions will require authentication of device credentials for the endpoints to prove the device’s digital identity. In such scenarios, an identity management approach based on passwords or passcodes is not practical, and PKI digital certificates are by far the best option for IoT credential management today.
Creating lifecycle management for connected devices, including revocation of expired certificates, is another example where PKI can help to secure IoT devices. Having a robust management platform that enables device management, revocation and renewal of certificates is a critical component of a successful PKI. IoT devices will also need regular patches and upgrades to their firmware, with code signing being critical to ensure the integrity of the downloaded firmware – another example of the close linkage between the IoT world and the PKI world.
Summary
PKI certification benefits both people and processes. PKI enables identity assurance while digital certificates validate the identity of the connected device. Use of PKI for IoT is a necessary trend for sense of trust in the network and for quality control of device management.
Identifying the IoT device is critical in managing its lifespan and recognizing its legitimacy in the network. Building in the ability for PKI at the device’s manufacture is critical to enable the device for its lifetime. By recognizing a device, information on it can be maintained in an inventory and its lifecycle and replacement can be better managed. Once a certificate has been distributed and certified, having the control of PKI systems creates life-cycle management.
There are two types of organisations – those that know that they have had a cybersecurity breach and those that don’t. With ransomware accounting for a rapidly growing proportion of breaches, not knowing you have been breached is less likely. In the last two months, we have seen a series of devastating ransomware attacks. These have included attacks on critical infrastructure, Colonial Pipeline and JBS, and the more recent supply chain attack on Kaseya, infecting its customers’ customers with ransomware. We’ve also seen an increase in attacks on soft targets such as schools and hospitals.
What is ransomware? Well, it’s a type of malware that specialises in encrypting the victim’s data and demands a ransom for a decryption key which may or may not work. If the victim fails to pay, their data could be sold or published online. More worryingly, if the victim pays, their data could still be sold or published online, prolonging the agony. Common ransomware families include REvil, Locky, Wannacry, Cerber, NotPetya, Maze and Darkside.
Why is Ransomware Becoming more Widespread?
Increased digitisation, remote working, accelerated adoption of cloud computing and growth in IoT devices, have expanded the attack surface for threat actors – offering more vulnerabilities that can be exploited. Launching a ransomware attack is a relatively easy and low-risk way to make money for cyber-criminals. Threat actors are usually outside the jurisdiction where the attack takes place and are typically protected by the absence of extradition treaties between the country where the crime occurred and the country from where the attack was launched. As well as posing a remarkably low risk to the attacker the rewards from a successful ransomware attack are potentially very large. Ransomware as a service (RaaS) kits can be purchased on the dark web for a few hundred dollars and if used repeatedly are likely to find at least one victim. Cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin make it virtually impossible for law enforcement authorities to track ransom payments. Consequently, the rapid growth in ransoms combined with the increasing risk of successful ransomware attacks is leading to banks stocking up on bitcoin. This allows their customers to quickly pay ransoms.
How to Mitigate the Risks?
Companies will not be able to completely eliminate the risk of ransomware attacks. They can, however, mitigate the risk of these attacks with a zero-trust approach to cybersecurity, renewed focus on training and awareness programs, and well-prepared and rehearsed incident response plans.
Rigorously applying the principle of least privilege will make it harder for threat actors to gain the credentials that they need to move laterally within systems and networks. Segmenting networks and isolating workloads will limit the blast radius of attacks. Training and awareness campaigns will make employees less likely to download malware via phishing attacks or other social engineering activities. Ensuring that all sensitive data is classified and encrypted will make double extortion more difficult – a miserable scenario where the victim pays a ransom for a decryption key and is then asked to pay a further ransom for the dubious promise that stolen data will not be leaked.
Protecting against supply chain ransomware attacks, such as the Kaseya breach, is fiendishly difficult. In the case of Kaseya, attackers identified a zero-day vulnerability in its VSA IT management and monitoring tool. An update was then infected with ransomware and shared with managed service providers, who, in turn infected their customers with the ransomware.
Rehearsed incident response plans that prepare for a successful ransomware attack are essential controls against such threats. A critical component of such a plan is backup and recovery. Backups are increasingly being targeted in well-orchestrated attacks so companies must find ways of ensuring that their data is stored in at least one immutable destination. This means that they can recover quickly – often almost instantly if the process is automated.
If companies follow cybersecurity best practices such as those outlined above, they should be able to manage ransomware risk and the misery associated with these attacks. If a ransomware attack occurs, well-prepared companies will be able to recover rapidly and be comfortable in the knowledge that the data which has been stolen is of little or no value to the attackers.
